inanedirk: (Gir - Squidhead)
So I bought Stasis a few days ago. I'd been looking forward to its release ever since I heard of it. It doesn't quite live up to my expectations though, unfortunately.

To give you an idea, Stasis is an Indie Isometric Science Fiction Horror Adventure Game. The protagonist wakes by from stasis on an unfamiliar space ship that obviously is severely damaged. Thing is, the last thing he remembers is going into stasis next to his wife and kid in order to start their vacation. The goal of the game is survival, finding out wtf is going on, and finding your family.


Now, I really like the setting of the game. You soon find out that the space ship you're on is owned by a big corporation conducting illegal experiments (DNA manipulation and cloning) on humans, on this very ship. They're totally ruthless, and collect stasis pods anywhere they can get them in order to use their contents for their experiments. Naturally the protagonist is frantically trying to find his family.

Unfortunately, that's all I really like about this game. Graphically, it's okay. The setting is visualised well enough, but it does look 10+ years old. IMO that's acceptable for a small independent developer though.

What most irks me is how far fetched some of the puzzles are. Early in the game, you need to fake a leak on a tank. Having only very few items, I decided to try to use a glass shard on my character, thinking he'd cut himself for a few drops of blood. Well, what he did was thrusting the shard into his intestines, killing himself.
Killing yourself is ridiculously easy in the game.

Here's another example of a puzzle that I didn't like: There's a gas leak, and I'm convinced I'm supposed to blow it up. I've got a lighter, so I place it close to the leak. What you're supposed to do is go to a save place and use a stick to prod the lighter so that it ignites the gas. Thing is, the game requires you to do it from a certain place. If you prod it from the wrong position you'll die in the explosion, but being as close, just in a different position, prodding the lighter works without you getting killed. What's worse, once you plant the lighter nothing will happen, but if you go close to the leak again it'll suddenly explode, killing you! Why does it explode when you get close? Why doesn't it when you keep your distance? That doesn't make any sense!

Another puzzle is not a proper puzzle at all IMO: You arrive at a tube station. The tubes are used to transport stuff from one department to the other on the ship. There's several things wrong with this puzzle actually: First of all, you'll find a box addressed to <some department>, and below are three connected symbols - when I saw them I thought abstract floor plan. They're just two colours, forming what looks like rooms and connecting passages. Now close by is a terminal that let's you enter the intended destination, you have to choose from different symbols on three positions to get the correct one, i.e. the one showing on the box.

Seriously, WHY THE HELL would you have a process to input the target destination in such a complicated way? The transport boxes have the destination written on them in plain text, so why would the destination selector be encoded at all, and in such a weird way? What would actually make sense is a simple list of available destinations to select one from. So this is an example of a puzzle that's just there for the sake of itself.

The second reason this entire puzzle feels stupid, you find several boxes with different destinations. When you enter any of them though, the terminal will simply say "no destination set". What should happen, you should be able to enter the transport and be shipped to a wrong location. It might be a dead end, or, seeing how happily the game will kill you, you might end up crashing or being jettisoned into space.

Instead, the only destination the terminal actually accepts is the one you have to go to because of the plot. I was so angry when I realised I couldn't travel to the wrong destination ...


So that's a few reasons why I find the game disappointing. I'll probably still finish it because I want to know what's going to happen. But I'm in no hurry really...
inanedirk: (Default)
Wiso hat eben einen Bericht gezeigt, über Futter für Tiere in Not. Es ging darum, dass ein Vertreter einer Person ein einjähriges Spenden-Abo angedreht hat. Der Betroffene wollte eigentlich gar nichts abschließen, hat sich dann aber doch überzeugen lassen, weil ihm gesagt wurde, dass die Spende 1:1 an das Tierheim in seinem Wohnort geht.
Später stornierte er die Sache dann wieder, weil sie ihm zu dubios war (insbesondere, weil er keine Spendenquittung erhalten hatte).

So viel also dazu. Ich komm aber nicht umhin, mich zu fragen, wieso der nicht von vornherein Zweifel hatte. Zunächst mal ist da der Name - Futter für Tiere in Not. Klingt ja ganz nett, aber wo ist das e.V.?! Sowas würde ich eigentlich bei einer Spendenorganisation erwarten ... Und dann dieses Argument, die Spende ginge komplett an das örtliche Tierheim? Wenn ich tatsächlich dem Tierheim spenden will, dann wende ich mich doch direkt an das Tierheim, oder nicht?! Wozu einen Mittelmann einschalten? Wenn ich mich selbt drum kümmere, ist das doch am sichersten, oder etwa nicht?
(In diesem speziellen Falle war's übrigens so, dass das Tierheim gegen das Unternehmen bereits Klage eingereicht hatte, weil gar keine Vereinbarung bestand und das Unternehmen nie irgendwas an das Tierheim gezahlt hatte.)

Na ja, der Bericht ging noch weiter, mit dem Ergebnis, dass das ganze total unseriös ist. Vertreter, die 60 Verträge (also, eine Spende pro Monat für mindestens ein Jahr) und mehr abschließen, bekommen einen eigenen Dienstwagen (hallo? wovon wird der denn bezahlt?!). Okay, A-Klasse, aber aus irgendeinem Grund kosten sogar die Geld!
Und die Tierheime, die mit dem Unternehmen zusammenarbeiteten, haben zum Teil minderwertige Tiernahrung zu völlig überhöhten Preisen erhalten (also, nicht dass die Tierheime das Futter bezahlen mußten, aber in einem Beispiel erhielt ein Tierheim Tiernahrung im vermeintlichen Wert von 76k€, das es anderweitig locker für 26k€ hätte kaufen können) ...

Lange Rede .... http://www.futter-fuer-tiere-in-not.de nicht mit denen einlassen!

*vent*

Dec. 16th, 2005 05:33 pm
inanedirk: (Default)
you know what pisses me off?
Sales people.

I've had one or two missed calls each day these past few days, always without caller id, always leaving no message after the beep.
So, that's either my parents (though after being unable to reach me for several days, they most likely would've left a message, or e-Mailed instead).
Or, it's one of those fucking sales people, for example the one that just managed to reach me.

Why the hell do I even bother to talk to those people ffs?
I blame my parents actually, for raising me to be polite.
Politeness is wasted on those fuckers.
Yet being impolite makes me feel bad about it afterwards.
Why do I have to justify using the phone service I use?

Ever noticed how no one ever calls you to ask if you'd like to rent a car?
Because we expect customers who want to use our service to come to us.

So why do those phone service people think they can sell me a different service?
Wouldn't you think that, if I thought my phone bill was too high, I'd go out on the net to research a cheaper alternative?
Well, I haven't. Because I'm not interested.

Same goes for those people selling credit cards at the airport btw.
I still can't quite grasp that they're successful.



Actually, that gives me an idea.
The next time some such person calls, I'm going to ask them if they want to rent a car.

March 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12 13 1415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 25th, 2017 08:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios